In 2017, Conservation International (CI) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), which had collaborated on building a software platform named the Wildlife Management Analytics system or WMA, were looking for a way to market the product. The WMA, which made camera trap data on biodiversity easier to analyze, was being incorporated into a free, public, cloud-based website called Wildlife Insights. CI, however, anticipated that scientists, governments, NGOs, businesses, and landowners might want to operate "private instances" of the software, i.e., separate customizable databases on which more specific analyses could be run. HPQ had licensed the software to CI and the nonprofit believed that the best way to distribute the WMA was to sell access to the software, offsetting some of its costs.
CI confronted a number of important questions in trying to implement their plan. How should CI determine pricing for the software while advancing its objectives as a nonprofit organization? How did this initiative fit into CI’s advocacy work and mission? Whom should CI charge for the use of the software, and what factors should they take into account when deciding how much to charge? And with scientists increasingly wary of environmental organizations pushing an agenda at the expense of what academics saw as intellectual honesty, would CI be able to drum up enough enthusiasm for the solution?
Published Date: 06/06/2018
Suggested Citation: Vero Bourg-Meyer, Jaan Elias, and Judith Chevalier, "Conservation International and Hewlett Packard Enterprise," Yale SOM Case 17-021, June 6, 2018
Keywords: Nonprofit Management, Conservation Biology, Brazil, Extractive, Mining, Third Wave Environmentalism, Center for Environmental Leadership in Business, Program Service Revenue, Climate Change, TEAM Network, Wildlife Picture Index, Intellectual Property